Is non-financial servitude possible online?
Filed Under black fuhrer, financial domination, money slavery
For the most part, I do not believe that it is possible for a sub to serve online without there being a financial element to it. You don’t have to necessarily be a money domme to have this belief. It’s just logic and common sense.
In order for there to be an element of “servitude” one party necessarily has to gain by the labor of the other. So in the example of say. . . .a boy sticking a rubber dong up his ass. . .the element of labor isn’t there nor is there a “gain” on the part of the other party. The only “gain” is realized by the male doing the dong stuffing. This hold true for the gamut of fetishes out there that boys try to equate as “service.” Smart women don’t buy it for a second.
So *are* there any other type of service that can be done without the exchange of money? Sure there is. But rarely is it sustainable. For instance, a boy can be a web designer. Okay. . .so he builds a website. Maybe two or three. But that “service” becomes useless once the need for more websites becomes non existent. Then what? And this holds true for most skills. One guy told me he had the “skill” to remotely access my computer and remove viruses. How often would I need that?
So once again it boils down to money. Not because someone is “necessarily” greedy (though that may be the case and there is nothing wrong with that.) But there really isn’t much of an alternative. Money buys clothes. Money pays for web designers. Money isn’t something that you routinely “have too much of.” Money never gets in the way. Money is a way to “show” your labor. Money shows that you aren’t just all talk.
If you can come up with ways to serve online that doesn’t involve finances. . . .by ALL MEANS. . .share it with the class.
Comments
Leave a Reply